Come join the BreakmanX discord server.
https://discord.gg/6h95ZUPG5M

Image

Is it time for another crash?

Talk about BreakmanX.com!
User avatar
AIDS
Import Editor
Import Editor
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 9:32 pm

Is it time for another crash?

Post by AIDS »

http://www.pointlesswasteoftime.com/games/crash.html

Here's and interesting and amusing article. I don't really agree with everything the guy says, but he does bring up a few interesting points.
Hell hath no fury for a woman's scorn for Sega.

-Brodie
User avatar
Yankee
Gaming God
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 12:40 pm
Location: Kansas City
Contact:

Post by Yankee »

Kinda cool. I don't think the video game industry will crash though. Even though the graphics aren't getting better, we as humans get tired of what we have, so we'll buy new stuff to replace it. I mean how many "innovations" have their been in movies lately? I mean you see the Matrix and the "bullet time" then everyone does it, and it's old news. We still go to see movies. I know at least for me, game buying won't stop until organ theives steal my hands.
Currently Playing:

World of Warcraft (PC)

Image
User avatar
The Siege
Resident Asshole
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 1:19 am
Location: STL Representin'!
Contact:

Post by The Siege »

I would be worried, maybe, if it weren't for the Nintendo DS. I'm making my prediction right now: The successor to the DS will stomp the SHIT out of EVERYTHING. EVERYTHING. PS3, X-Box2, even the N5. In the future, all that will be left is PC, GBA, and DS.

This is half-assed, insane prediction was brought to you by The Siege.

Perhaps I should expound on why? Ok, here goes:

PC: FPS and online gaming, plus everyone needs a PC to begin with. FPS on console is great, but remember the consoles won't be worth shit anymore, right? The mouse+keyboard are the optimal setup for playing an FPS of any kind, and online gaming is optimal over the PC, because the PC is already designed to be a network oriented device to begin with (incidentally, FPS may be possible on the DS using the stylus and touch screen, but no one has ever tried this so it may or may not work).

GBA: The lightweight. Cheap, small, fun. For the person who just wants to play simple, 2D games. The GBA will have a market because the DS will be bigger and more complex, and more expensive. Simple.

DS: The DS planned already can support N64 level graphics. It's not a stretch to imagine it's successor will look just as good if not better than the X-Box and Gamecube. So instead of buying an extra console that supports slightly better graphics, people can just buy a cheap, AV cable accessory and plug their DS right into their TV. Who needs a lunky console when you can have a portable, console, and controller all in one? This is bound to happen eventually, even if the DS does not catch on, graphics will hit a wall and the GBA will catch up, and then there will be no reason to own the consoles anymore.

Not to mention the touch screen and wireless LAN interface. Eventually entire cities will be blanketed in 802.11G wireless internet access (this is already being developed in California), so the DS will be able to tap into those and serve as an online device as well.
[StarLink] 06.28.04
User avatar
Realm
The Alpha and Omega
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 12:32 pm
Location: Kings Point, NY
Contact:

Post by Realm »

Next stop: the Matrix.
I have spoken.