Rainbow 6 Vegas.

Post by **Verence** » Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:49 am

Yup.

I don't like the level design of R6V as much though, and its graphics are quite a bit less impressive than GoW's.

BUT, R6V does have a cool leveling system with actual rewards. As you advance through the multiplayer ranks you earn new equipment, weapons, clothing, armor, and other things to make your online persona more unique.

That counts for a lot in my book.

I hope more games adopt similar systems for their online multiplayer in the future.

Mericks · Post by **Mericks** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 7:35 pm

Verence wrote:Uh, so it's impossible for two games to have similar gameplay styles?

I NEVER said that. You just very obviously misunderstood what I said. Either way I don't give a shit right now. I'll let you win and do your little fuckin' victory dance since I'm gonna cut off any arguments I'm in on the net at the moment...

There, 1 down, 138 to go.

Post by **Verence** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:15 pm

Maybe you should stop starting pointless arguments. >_>

Mericks · Post by **Mericks** » Sat Dec 30, 2006 11:14 pm

Actually, no one starts an argument alone. Every argument started is a group effort.

Post by **Verence** » Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:48 am

...

And here we go again. -_-

Mericks · Post by **Mericks** » Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:04 pm

Omfg...You're more pathetic than me...(something that SHOULD be impossible)

I'm not even going to say anything more though since all you're going to do is try to deny the fact.

Post by **Verence** » Sun Dec 31, 2006 6:32 pm

You start arguments all the time. It's true that it take two to argue, but you still start them.

Half of your posts seem to start with "ACTUALLY...", implying in a very tactless tone that you are right and the other party is wrong. You don't see how that might be considered provocative?

Like just now I said that GoW and R6V were very similar gameplay-wise. I wasn't even talking to you. Yet you felt the need, as if by reflex, to gainsay my very simple and quite correct statement, even though I suspect you have never played either game.

As to why I could not even hazard a guess...

EDIT:

And now for something completely different...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwEwLDR61bo

Mericks · Post by **Mericks** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 6:01 am

Verence wrote:You start arguments all the time. It's true that it take two to argue, but you still start them.

In an analogy to a fire, I was the spark and you were the dried grass. You were already there, and I had to interfere. When I came in, you saw fit to give the oxygen needed for the flame to start. Granted there is 1 hole in that analogy, but the principal will still hold true.

Verence wrote:Like just now I said that GoW and R6V were very similar gameplay-wise. I wasn't even talking to you. Yet you felt the need, as if by reflex, to gainsay my very simple and quite correct statement, even though I suspect you have never played either game.

...Drum roll please...

...Uh...fine then. And...

You-
are-
wrong!

Hm...I should make an acronymn for that... Either way, you seem to have taken the argument joke I was throwing there a bit far now, don't you? Even I don't take a joke this far out of proportion.

Post by **Verence** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:10 pm

You make a strong case for the innocence of arsonists, but I'm still right.

About everything.

Mericks · Post by **Mericks** » Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:51 pm

Verence wrote:You make a strong case for the innocence of arsonists, but I'm still right.

About everything.

That sounded a lot like my brother, only he never actually said it blatantly but, everyone knows... There's no hiding it, we all know.

Post by **Verence** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:31 am

So what was the topic of this thread again?

Oh yeah, R6V.

It doesn't seem like anyone else is playing it. Am I just online at bad times? What times are you guys playing?