i agree that a console design isn't the most important thing. the control design does mean something though. anyway, i think its a little harsh to say that this is a lack of innovation, because nintendo wasn't really trying to push the envelope with this. it is just to cash in. if you want innovention get the ds, its not even a year old what do we need a super new innovated gba for? this is just to get more sales. its what a company does, can you really blame them? it was the same thing with the slim ps2. which was less innovative if you ask me because it lost functions, such as not being able to have the harddrive. if anything this puts more money to revolution and doesn't take it way. the better gameboy sales do the more risks with other products nintendo can take. its the same way microsoft worked. they lost money on the console but it didn't matter becasue their other products more than made up for the loss.Richie wrote:I don't really care what my console looks like; style it like a toaster for all I care. My problem is the lack of innovation. It feels like Nintendo is just re-re-releasing their handheld to cash in on the Weezer-types. I'd rather they save their money and put it towards Revolution, so it'll stand a better chance of competing with the next-gen.
this is just my opinion though.